Exciting Notes from Washington DC Feed-In Tariff Workshop

Greetings from Washington DC!

Yesterday I spent the entire day at the “FIT for the Future” strategy workshop. It was absolutely fascinating, crammed with information and fascinating speakers. Co-hosted by the World Future Council, Heinrich Boll Foundation, and the Worldwatch Institute, the event brought in speakers from France, Germany, and Spain to speak about the Feed-In Tariff programs in their countries, as well as U.S. legislators working towards FIT laws, and organizations in favor of the policy. It was fascinating to be sitting in a room full of so many highly intelligent people who were eager to discuss the possibilities and issues surrounding bringing FIT legislation to the U.S.

Tellingly, Oliver Schafer, from the European Renewable Energy Council, ended the third panel by noting that many Europeans think that U.S. energy policy centers around the question, “How did our oil get under their sand?” However, this conference has opened his eyes – let’s ensure that this workshop results in meaningful action!

I will not go into detail about the substance of the workshop, as we will hopefully have more detailed blog posts in the near future, but for now I thought I’d give some highlights.

Chris Flavin, from the Worldwatch Institute, opened the day challenging us to think up a new name for FIT, something that does not have a negative subcontext. Some of the ideas brought up throughout the day were “energy freedom act,” “fair and efficient rates,” “standard offer program,” and “microgeneration.” What do you think?

One issue brought up was, “How do we, from a political standpoint, convince Americans to vote to increase their electricity bills?” Of course, there were the normal replies about emphasizing the environmental and karmic gains, and emphasizing how any type of energy or change in energy source policy will probably add to the bill, but I found the answer given by Hugo Lucas Porta, who works for the IDEA in Spain, to be the most creative. He said that in Spain they intend to give incentives for citizens to reduce their electricity use so that their electricity bill will go down, and thus, even with the FIT in place, their bill will probably still be even lower than before. Pairing these two policies makes quite a difference.

I don’t want this blog post to drag on, so I will just end with a most compelling idea from Paul Gipe’s speech: With FIT laws, we move from being a nation of consumers to being a nation of producers.

(I took the photo of the Washington Monument- I’ve been indulging in a bit of sightseeing, as this is my first time ever in DC!)

Comments

[Becca]

I'm very excited to hear more about these workshops. About how many people are in attendance? "Energy Freedom Act" kind of reminds me of "freedom fries." (Which I'm not sure is a great thing.) Have a blast in DC!

[Ananda]

There were about 70 people at the Sunday workshop- and at least that many at the Thursday panel at WIREC! It was really exciting.

I don't know if I like that name either... The bill Jay Insall is submitting at the Federal level calls it "performance-based incentive," or "PVI." At least that's better...